Benzemu ne racunam , mnogo vise od napadaca je.
Kane je malo bolja verzija Immobilea
Moderatori/ce: ribery,Monolog,_dreamer_,hammers,geronimo,rio_Ferdy88,Otelo
U Pepovom sistemu ni jedan napadac klasicni nema dodira sa loptom.Jednostavno takva igra.Njemu u Barci Zlatan nije imao vise od 10 dodira po utakmici.harden je napisao/la: ↑27 avg 2022, 18:23Pa lik je los tehnicar ( los u ovom smislu znaci da nije vrhunski kao sto je u ostalim segmentima ), ne znam sta je sporno. Los prvi dodir, pas igra nije nesto... jel ti mislis da je Pep glup pa ovaj slucajno ima po 5 dodavanja na utakmici? Eliminise mu manu jer ga sakriva u build upu.
Pa dobar je finisher i dosta sudjeljuje u gradjenju igre al u tim segmetnima nije na nivou ovog Benza. Tehnicki od R9 i Henryja nijedan napadac nije na Benzovom nivou. Opet kazem, steta sto citavu karijeru nije imao ekipu koja ce mu biti maksimalno posvecena. Brojke bi bile jos puno strasnije.Cipiripiblicblic je napisao/la: ↑27 avg 2022, 18:51Poštujem tvoje mišljenje, ali ja ne mislim da bi Benzema mogao Tottenhamu dati ono što Kane daje. Dosta podcjenjuješ Kaneov finishing i sudjelovanje u igri.
@Sport90, nije on kriv što Southgate igra s 12 igrača u obrani. Dobio je dvije upotrebljive lopte, iz prve je kreirao šansu za gol.
Odlican je Kane , odlican je i Imobile.Ako sam rekao da je bolji od njega , ne znaci da je los , cak sta vise.meni nije nivou Benzeme , Halanda , Mbapea ili Lewe.Cipiripiblicblic je napisao/la: ↑27 avg 2022, 18:51Poštujem tvoje mišljenje, ali ja ne mislim da bi Benzema mogao Tottenhamu dati ono što Kane daje. Dosta podcjenjuješ Kaneov finishing i sudjelovanje u igri.
@Sport90, nije on kriv što Southgate igra s 12 igrača u obrani. Dobio je dvije upotrebljive lopte, iz prve je kreirao šansu za gol.
Pa on se nije niti na jednom nivou dokazao i iskazao. U karijeri ima 0 titula 0 kupova prazno. Najveći uspjeh finale LP i EP i u tom pohodu nije bio ključni igrač. Na EPu nije bio ni u idealnih 11. Mislim on je top za Tot, ali za velike klubove kako engleske tako i svijetle bio bi totalni prosjek - nikakva prevaga koja bi donosila trofeje i dimenziju vise u njihovoj igri. Ne kontam na osnovu čega se smatra on nekim WC igracem - pa bolju karijeru ima jedan VardiCipiripiblicblic je napisao/la: ↑27 avg 2022, 18:51Poštujem tvoje mišljenje, ali ja ne mislim da bi Benzema mogao Tottenhamu dati ono što Kane daje. Dosta podcjenjuješ Kaneov finishing i sudjelovanje u igri.
@Sport90, nije on kriv što Southgate igra s 12 igrača u obrani. Dobio je dvije upotrebljive lopte, iz prve je kreirao šansu za gol.
A koliko sam čuo, trebali su i Njuku uzeti.wadethegreat je napisao/la: ↑27 avg 2022, 19:12Samo da napomenem da Brighton ima isto bodova kao City uz jedan primljen gol![]()
Ok, ovo će se haman morati postavljati nakon svake tekme Citya, nije problemJoeBleck je napisao/la: ↑27 avg 2022, 18:54U Pepovom sistemu ni jedan napadac klasicni nema dodira sa loptom.Jednostavno takva igra.Njemu u Barci Zlatan nije imao vise od 10 dodira po utakmici.harden je napisao/la: ↑27 avg 2022, 18:23Pa lik je los tehnicar ( los u ovom smislu znaci da nije vrhunski kao sto je u ostalim segmentima ), ne znam sta je sporno. Los prvi dodir, pas igra nije nesto... jel ti mislis da je Pep glup pa ovaj slucajno ima po 5 dodavanja na utakmici? Eliminise mu manu jer ga sakriva u build upu.
Haland nije savrsen ali daleko od ispodprosjecnog tehnicara.U njegovom slucaju tehnika je sut i dodir.A ja ne vidim da mu je first touch toliko ocajan , uostalom ko bi zabijao 1 go po utakmici da ne zna primiti loptu.
Treba napomenuti da napadacu koji uvijek ide okomito ka golu mnogo teze je kontrolisati loptu u odnosu na igrace koji primaju direktno loptu , Haland je u 80% slucajeva prima u punom trku.Jednostavno takav stil igre ima , ne komplikuje , ne okolisa.Ide direkt na go i to je ono sto ga krasi.Pored fizikalija koje su brutalne , tehnika je vise nego solidna, kako suta tako i kontrole lopte u punom trku.
Treba li reći i da je ovo za Zlatana laž?Rajaz je napisao/la: ↑22 sep 2021, 19:32Samo za znalce
Player Analysis: Erling Haaland
https://breakingthelines.com/player-ana ... g-haaland/
Hold-up Play and Creativity
However, there are quite a few times when Haaland doesn’t engage in hold-up situations even when he would have a clear size advantage against the defender. In the same game, the youngster lets the defender get in front of him to win the header when he could have used traditional hold-up techniques to win the ball and lay it off to Reus for a counter. The underlying numbers back this up as he’s only receiving 50.7% passes to him, which ranks in the 20th percentile for forwards in Europe’s top five leagues.
The 20-year-old’s passing tends to be hit or miss and this is reflected in his pass accuracy percentage, which is just above average for strikers at 72.3%. This is largely down to the fact that most of his passes are first-time flicks or layoffs, which are lower percentage passes.
This is an aspect of his game that can be improved but it should not come as a huge surprise that his passing can be weak. There is usually a correlation between players who tend to have better ball control and touch having higher quality in passing. Haaland is not one of those players. His frame makes it difficult for him to control the ball at times as the ball can cannon off his legs quite frequently but it’s an aspect in his game that he is getting better at.
This leads nicely onto his dribbling skill, which is similar to his passing in that he is just above average. However, that is not to say that he can’t still hold his own in this category as there are quite a few positives. His speed and physicality can be a great asset in 1vs1 situations and have helped him complete 56.4% of his dribbles but this is on quite a low volume – 1.68 dribbles per game.
So how does Haaland’s skill set in these departments transfer onto impact on the pitch? The focus will be on looking at Haaland’s ability to create as top forwards can facilitate chances for their teammates at a great rate. The graph below displays three different metrics describing creation: shot-creating actions, expected goals assisted and key passes.
The graph shows Haaland being below average in both shot-creating actions and key passes but his 0.19 xA is a promising figure. He ranks in the 87th percentile in this category against forwards in Europe’s top five leagues. It’s clear that he is not generating these quality chances by passing, so is he doing this by dribbling?
Below is another graph that looks at the shots created via dribbling and fouls won in comparison to dribbling volume. The graph highlights that Haaland, marked in red, doesn’t create a lot of shots from dribbling and doesn’t do this efficiently either. Therefore, he is not creating good quality chances via dribbling either. Instead, he creates great opportunities for his teammates the same way he creates for himself – his off-ball movement.
![]()
Ne mogu da vjerujem da stvarno gledate kod njih.