SportSport.ba

BuffonGigi je napisao/la: ↑

01 mar 2023, 16:26

Ovaj bolesnik napise 10000 postova poslije svake pobjede, pa makar i sugave, a poslije poraza se ne loguje na forum po 5 dana.

Juventinisimo je napisao/la: ↑

01 mar 2023, 18:02

Niko ne spominje Rovellu?

Vidi brata @Pogbe...kaze cojku, "ne gledas fudbal"..samo na prvu brate, u kosti.....

Juventus appeal: four reasons why 15-point deduction must be revoked

Tuttosport published part of the appeal made by Juventus lawyers against a 15-point deduction, highlighting four reasons why the penalty must be revoked.

The Old Lady has lodged an appeal against a 15-point deduction imposed by FIGC in January.

Tuttosport has published part of the 90-page document prepared by Juventus’ lawyers for their appeal to CONI. They highlight four reasons why the FIGC ruling was ‘unfair’ and should therefore be revoked.

There are only two ways for CONI: either confirm the ruling or cancel it, which means reformulating the point deduction isn’t an option. It’s basically all or nothing for the Bianconeri.

So, why do Juventus believe the ruling was unfair?

The club lawyers insist that no formal rule prohibits capital gains, which is one reason why the Bianconeri were cleared of allegations in a trial in 2022, along with other Italian clubs, including Napoli, and over 50 club directors.

One of the reasons why the FIGC punished Juventus in January is because, in the meantime, new evidence emerged from the criminal investigation carried out by the Turin Prosecutor, including wiretaps and a notebook belonging to Federico Cherubini where, among other things, he blamed his predecessor Fabio Paratici for the excessive use of capital gains.

However, according to Juventus, lawyers, the evidence that emerged is ‘not new’ and the article used by the FIGC Court to justify the point deduction (63 CGS CONI) does not allow an overruling because of ‘new events’ but only for a ‘factual error.’ Juventus also believe the FIGC Court had already scrutinised the most relevant wiretaps and documents when the club was cleared of allegations in 2022.

The third reason is that, according to Juventus lawyers, the FIGC changed the charge against the club, ruling over a new matter without consulting the defence lawyers and committing a ‘serious and blatant violation of the right of defence and the right to be heard.’

Last but not least, Juventus insist that inflated transfer values – also known as Plusvalenze – had a low impact on the club’s finances. ‘Between 2018 and 2021, Juventus’ revenues reached €1,675 billion, while the alleged artificially inflated transfer values are worth €60m, so only 3.6%.’

Spal president Tacopina believes shady politics are behind Juventus Plusvalenza punishment


Last January, Juventus received a major blow in the form of a 15-point deduction with immediate effect. So while the Bianconeri were supposed to be second in the Serie A standings, they currently sit 7th, outside of European spots.

The federal court of appeal handed the severe sentence following the reopening of the Plusvalenza case (based on alleged illegal practice in relation to capital gains).

For his part, Spal president Joe Tacopina believes that shady politics were behind the ruling, with some looking to make an example of the Agnelli family and casting aside the legendary long-standing dynasty.

“It seems like they wanted to make a statement. The old guard is gone now and sending off the Agnelli family,” said Tacopina in an exclusive interview with The Italian Football Podcast.

“They’re gone now, the Agnelli were synonymous with Italian football. They are being made an example of and I don’t think what is happening to them is warranted based on their actions. But we’re in a different world now.”

The famous American lawyer and businessman feels that the Italian football justice failed to ensure fairness and justice on and off the field.

“Here’s my issue with Italian football. As long as there’s justice on and off the field and are handed out equally to all then I’m fine with that. I have an issue sometimes that doesn’t seem to happen. I want to be clear there should be fairness across the board, whether you’re dealing with Juventus or Sassuolo.

“Juventus were a club who people said the league was in their pockets and the referees were in their pockets and they were called thieves but we’re not there anymore clearly, and so the pendulum shouldn’t swing too far the other way either.”

The Spal patron had also served as Venezia and Bologna president in the past and was also the vice-president of Roma between 2011 and 2014.

Juventinisimo je napisao/la: ↑

02 mar 2023, 19:37

Spal president Tacopina believes shady politics are behind Juventus Plusvalenza punishment


Last January, Juventus received a major blow in the form of a 15-point deduction with immediate effect. So while the Bianconeri were supposed to be second in the Serie A standings, they currently sit 7th, outside of European spots.

The federal court of appeal handed the severe sentence following the reopening of the Plusvalenza case (based on alleged illegal practice in relation to capital gains).

For his part, Spal president Joe Tacopina believes that shady politics were behind the ruling, with some looking to make an example of the Agnelli family and casting aside the legendary long-standing dynasty.

“It seems like they wanted to make a statement. The old guard is gone now and sending off the Agnelli family,” said Tacopina in an exclusive interview with The Italian Football Podcast.

“They’re gone now, the Agnelli were synonymous with Italian football. They are being made an example of and I don’t think what is happening to them is warranted based on their actions. But we’re in a different world now.”

The famous American lawyer and businessman feels that the Italian football justice failed to ensure fairness and justice on and off the field.

“Here’s my issue with Italian football. As long as there’s justice on and off the field and are handed out equally to all then I’m fine with that. I have an issue sometimes that doesn’t seem to happen. I want to be clear there should be fairness across the board, whether you’re dealing with Juventus or Sassuolo.

“Juventus were a club who people said the league was in their pockets and the referees were in their pockets and they were called thieves but we’re not there anymore clearly, and so the pendulum shouldn’t swing too far the other way either.”

The Spal patron had also served as Venezia and Bologna president in the past and was also the vice-president of Roma between 2011 and 2014.

Mig_Mig je napisao/la: ↑

02 mar 2023, 19:39

Fagioli mediokritet, Mireti WC igrac.

caseres je napisao/la: ↑

02 mar 2023, 20:44

Ben* kako vec

EnzoBerrenechea je napisao/la: ↑

02 mar 2023, 20:46

caseres je napisao/la: ↑

02 mar 2023, 20:44

Ben* kako vec

GIBRA je napisao/la: ↑

02 mar 2023, 19:56

Juventinisimo je napisao/la: ↑

02 mar 2023, 19:37

Spal president Tacopina believes shady politics are behind Juventus Plusvalenza punishment


Last January, Juventus received a major blow in the form of a 15-point deduction with immediate effect. So while the Bianconeri were supposed to be second in the Serie A standings, they currently sit 7th, outside of European spots.

The federal court of appeal handed the severe sentence following the reopening of the Plusvalenza case (based on alleged illegal practice in relation to capital gains).

For his part, Spal president Joe Tacopina believes that shady politics were behind the ruling, with some looking to make an example of the Agnelli family and casting aside the legendary long-standing dynasty.

“It seems like they wanted to make a statement. The old guard is gone now and sending off the Agnelli family,” said Tacopina in an exclusive interview with The Italian Football Podcast.

“They’re gone now, the Agnelli were synonymous with Italian football. They are being made an example of and I don’t think what is happening to them is warranted based on their actions. But we’re in a different world now.”

The famous American lawyer and businessman feels that the Italian football justice failed to ensure fairness and justice on and off the field.

“Here’s my issue with Italian football. As long as there’s justice on and off the field and are handed out equally to all then I’m fine with that. I have an issue sometimes that doesn’t seem to happen. I want to be clear there should be fairness across the board, whether you’re dealing with Juventus or Sassuolo.

“Juventus were a club who people said the league was in their pockets and the referees were in their pockets and they were called thieves but we’re not there anymore clearly, and so the pendulum shouldn’t swing too far the other way either.”

The Spal patron had also served as Venezia and Bologna president in the past and was also the vice-president of Roma between 2011 and 2014.

Opet spam

Allegri is thinking of reshaping the midfield as the season enters the final months. Max is looking to build it around Pogba and Rabiot. Formation’s are set to change, from the current 3-5-2 to the 4-3-3, but also watch for the return of the 4-2-3-1. #Juventus (@Gazzetta_it)