celikmilan je napisao/la: ↑27 jul 2024, 14:02
Kakva bolan bura. Došao je napadač za 13M. Sad će prodati par igrača da povrate te pare. Ako prodaju Thiawa doći će Pavlović i to je to. Možda još nekoga prodaju i to je kraj mercata.
Over the last year and change we heard people and the media throw the term MoneyBall around. Mostly people and especially the Italian media who don’t even understand what they are talking about. They think Moneyball is buy low-sell high so the big bad Milan owners can line up their greedy pockets.
Moneyball is buying undervalued, under appreciated players who will give you the same production as an overpriced, overhyped, overvalued player for the fraction of the cost. The Morata signing is a perfect example of a MoneyBall signing.
Let’s make comparison.
– Osimhen.
His transfer to Napoli cost 77.5 million. In 4 years at Napoli he has scored 76 goals (6 from penalty) and provided 18 assists. That’s an average of 19 goals per season in all competitions, and 4.5 assists. = 23.5 goal contributions per season.
– Vlahovic.
He cost Juventus 83.5 million, plus has the highest salary in the league. In the last 4 years between Fiorentina & Juve, he has scored 82 goals (17 penalties) and provided 15 assists. That comes up to 20.5 goals per season and 3.75 assists. = 24.25 goal contributions per season.
If we look just at his Juventus numbers, in 2.5 years he has scored 41 goals and 9 assists. That’s 16.4 goals and 3.6 assists = 20 goal contributions per season for Juve after they paid 83.5 mil for him.
– Giroud.
In 3 years as a Milan player, after he was bought for a whopping 4.8 mil and 3.5 mil a year salary, Giroud scored a total of 49 goals (11 penalties) and provided 20 assists. That’s 16.3 goals per season and 6.6 assists. = 22.9 goal contributions.
Giroud for just about the same amount of time has been more productive that Vlahovic after his big money transfer.
– Morata.
In 4 years, between Juve and Atletico, Morata has scored 69 goals (5 penalties) and dished out 29 assists. That’s 17.25 goals per season and 7.25 assists. = 24.5 goal contributions per season, the most of all 4 players.
Morata in the last 4 years has scored 6 less non penalty goals than Osimhen and only 1 less than Vlahovic. But hype around Vlahovic and Osimhen because of their transfer fee will make you think that they are a prolific goalscorer who guarantee you 20+ goals per season. The numbers don’t back that up.
Stop judging players based on how much they were bought for and the media and fan hype behind them. It’s all about production, and over the last 4 years, even though he played for defensive minded coaches like Allegri and Simeone, Morata has been more productive than players that cost 6 times more than him.
Jedan od komentara sa SempreMilan stranice. Lijepo opisano i napisano osim zavrsnice gdje je usrao i napisao da je Lautaro "best striker in the world"
. Ali poenta je da ne moras platiti puno para da bi imao igraca s ucinkom. Cijenu diktira potraznja to je pravilo ekonomije ako recimo imas par klubova iz EPL-a koji su zainteresovani za igraca naravno cijena astronomski skace. Kao primjer moze posluziti i Mudryk koji je placen 70 miliona i za kojeg su se borili Chelsea i Arsenal. Naravno da nije bilo njihovog interesa i da su u opticaju bili klubovi poput Lazia, Rome , Fiorentine otisao bi on za max 20 miliona. Ali to je fudbal danas ako te traze Real, Barcelona , EPL timovi itd cijena ti skace nenormalno , ako te traze klubovi poput Rome, Lazia, Leverkusena, Porta , Benfice, Napolia itd ides za max 20-30 miliona.
O Kvichi se pricalo dosta i prije dolaska u Napoli ali interes za njim skoro nije ni postojao dok Napoli nije usao u pricu i bilo je daj sta das, a danas je to igrac koji vrijedi 80+ miliona.
Ovaj Yoro iz Lillea je isto primjer dobar. Perez nije htio da plati vise od 30 miliona a United nudio 50-60 koliko vec. Normalno da ce Lille gledati da ga proda u EPL za vecu cijenu nego u Real koji im nudi mozda i realnu cifru za igraca.
